Functional Programing 101 :: WWH


WWH: What? Why? How?

  1. What: a quick (hopefully, useful to real world) guide to functional programing using JavaScript strongly based on most adequate book.
  2. Why: it might empower you to write more robust programs: reusable, shorter, easier to reason about, less prone to error among others.
  3. How: by providing a quick textual introduction (WWH) followed by a simple code example and when possible a real code example.

Intro :: concepts

Functional Programing

What: a way to build code in which you use functions as the main design tool.

Why: might lead to code that’s easier to test, debug, parallelize, and understand.

How: thinking about what programs should do instead of how, using functions as the major unit to solve problems on computer.

First Class Functions

What: “functions are like any other data type and there is nothing particularly special about them – they may be stored in arrays, passed around, assigned to variables.”

Why: use functions to compose programs in a style that you can easily reason about, maintain, reuse and grow.

How: just create and use functions to solve problems.

Pure Functions

What: “a function that, given the same input, will always return the same output and does not have any observable side effect.”

Why: with pure functions we can easily cache, debug, test and parallelize the processing of them. There is no state to understand / set up.

How: write functions that does not have side effect. Although we’ll eventually write programs that mutate values, we can certainly try to minimize it. (And when we do need to mutate values, we can use functions to help us)

Basic toolbox :: currying

What: “You can call a function with fewer arguments than it expects. It returns a function that takes the remaining arguments.”

Why: you can promote the reusability to function level, you can use them to compose programs that expects another function

How: build a function with n parameters that returns n functions instead of the immediate result.

Medium toolbox :: composing

What: is the act of creating your programs using lots of functions.

Why: this promotes the reuse at a great level and forces you to think about what instead of how.

How: chain functions to produce a new callable function.

Example :: motivational

What: a better example to motivate you to go further with functional programing.

Why: most near real world examples are great to motivate you to learn something.

How: since you can see all the concepts together, I think you’ll notice the value.

You can see the example running at and check the commented code down bellow.

Screen Shot 2016-04-27 at 2.17.19 PM

Advanced toolbox & conclusion

I hope you might see the benefits you can have from using one or other technique from functional programming but for sure there are other benefits not shown here, I strongly recommend you to read the INCREDIBLE free book (gitbook) “Professor Frisby’s Mostly Adequate Guide to Functional Programming”, in fact, most of the ideas and examples here are from it.

There are advanced techniques to deal with data mutation with less pain, to handle errors and exceptions without try and catch and more abstractions that can help you and you can read them on the book.

And don’t use the handcrafted curry and compose built here (they’re far from production-ready), instead use a library like Ramda, which provides many basic functions like: map, filter and other all of them already curried, or lodash-fp.

Yeah, there no monado here. A special thank to Daniel Martins and Juarez Bochi, they helped a lot.


3 tips to make you a better developer



I’m sorry for the clickbait headline, I didn’t have a better idea/name for it.

We (developers) occasionally produce lazy/messy code and from time to time we need to remember the most important rule: “We do code to solve problems but also for human being be able: to use, to maintain and to evolute”. 

TLDR; (a unit can be a: function, var, method, class, parameter and etc)

  1. Naming your units with care and meaning;
  2. Try to see your code as a series of transformation;
  3. When possible make yours units generic.

Keep in mind that these tips are just my opinions and at the best they were based on: excellent books (Refactoring, DDD, Clean Coder and etc ), articles & blog posts,  excellent people I’ve worked/paired with,  presentations,  tweets and experiences.

naming is hard

Name your units with care and meaning. Your code should be easy to understand.

Although naming things is really hard, it is also extremely important. Let’s a see a snippet of code:

Let’s discuss about this code above:

  • the function topComments receives an id but is it the id from the comment, user, article? Let’s say it’s form the user, therefore userId should vanish this doubt.
  • the name of the function is topComments but it looks like it’s getting the top 10 latest comments only thus we could call it top10LatestCommentsFrom.
  • the ajax function accept two callbacks one in case of success (succCB) and otherwise an error (errCB), I believe we can call them: onSuccess and onError for better understanding.
  • all the arguments are using short names and we can have less confusing names just by using the entire name.
  • you got the ideia, naming things to let the code clear!

Although we still have so many problems in this code, now it’s easier to understand and we only named things properly.

For sure there are some cases when short names are just okay, for example: when you’re developing an emulator or virtual machine you often use short names like sp (stack pointer) and pc (program counter) or even doing a very generic unit.

filter -> union -> compact -> kick

Try to see and fit your code as transformations, one after another.

Some say that in computer science almost all the problems can be reduced to only two major problems: sort and count things (plus doing these in a distributed environment), anyway the point is: we usually are coding to make transformation over data.

For instance our function top10LatestCommentsFrom could be summarized in these steps:

  1. fetch comments (all)
  2. sort them (by date)
  3. filter them (only top)
  4. select the first 10

Which are just transformations over an initial list, we can make our function top10LatestCommentsFrom much better with that mindset.


By the way this could lead you to easily understand the new kid on the block sometimes referred as Functional Reactive Programming.

<be generic>

Work to make your units generic.

Let’s imagine you are in an interview process and your first task is to code a function which prints the numbers 1, 2 and 3 concatenated with “Hello, “. It should print: “Hello, 1” and then “Hello, 2″…

Now they ask you to print also the letters: “D”, “K” and “C”.

It was the first step toward the “generic”, now the interviewers say you have also to print a list of person’s name but now it’ll be a list of objects [{name: “person”},…].

Things start to get specific again and the interviewers want to test you. They ask you to print a list of car’s brand [{brand: “Ferrari”}, ..] plus a list of game consoles with their architecture [{name: “PS4”, arch: “x86-64”}, …]

Yikes, I suppose you’re not proud of that code and probably your interviewers will be little concerned about your skills with development, let’s list some of the problems with this approach.

  • Naming (we’re calling a person of an item)
  • High coupling (the function print knows too much about each printable)
  • Lots of (inner) conditionals 😦 it’s really hard to read/maintain/evolute this code

What we can do?! Well, it seems that all we need to do is to iterate through an array and prints an item but each item will require a different way of printing.


I said naming is important but when you make something very generic you should also make the abstract names not tied to any concrete concept. In fact, in Haskell (let’s pretend I know Haskell) when a concrete type of something may vary we use single letters to take their place.

Bonus round

  1. Make your units of execution to perform a single task.
  2. Use dispatch/pattern matching/protocol something instead of conditionals.
  3. Enforce DRY as much as you can.

Will we only create and use dynamic languages in the future?

Since I’ve playing with some dynamic languages (Ruby and Clojure), I have been thinking about why would anybody create a new static typed language?! And I didn’t get the answer.

I started programming in Visual Basic and I taste its roots, which are almost all full of procedure commands (bunch of do, goto and end), then I moved to C#, sharper it changes the end’s for }’s and give us a little more power based on some premises: we can treat two different things in the same way, polymorphism. The last static language, but not the least, I used (and I use it) Java, abusing of his new way of treating a set of things equality, the interfaces and using its “powers” on reflections.

Although when I started to use Ruby I saw that I could treat a group of things equality without doing any extra work. I still need to code models and composed types, even though we can create or change them dynamically using “real power” of metaprogramming.

When I start to study and apply the Clojure and its principles, my first reaction was the rejection, how can I go on without my formal objects, how can I design software without a model in the head and so on. I wasn’t thinking about how actually I do software, currently I use TDD to design software and I don’t think what models I need to have, I do think in terms of “what I want”. At minimum, Clojure make me think about, do we really need object to design software?! .  A three days ago I saw an amazing video about similar thoughts: Some thoughts on Ruby after 18 months of Clojure.

Summarising: With my limited knowledge of theses languages, let’s suppose we use a function (which we don’t have source code) and we want to do something before that function is executed (intercept) using: VB I’ll need to check every single piece of code which we call this function and call another one, in Java we can use a AOP framework, in Ruby we can use the spells of metaprogramming. It seems that some frameworks, patterns and extra work aren’t needed more because of this dynamic language evolution.

My conclusions using dynamic languages (Clojure/Ruby) for now it’s: I write less code and reuse them more easy, so I don’t see any reason to create/use a new static typed language, would you see any motivation to do that?

PS: When I use C# (.Net Framework 1.3 – 2.0) it was not so super cool as today.

Clojure resources

Always that I start to learn a new language, I promise to keep the best resources links I found, but it never works. This post suppose to be updated often. Any broken link or suggestion, just comment and I’ll try to fix, add or remove it.

Links, tutorials, guides, documentations, screencasts and etc.

  1. Clojure official site
  2. Installing Clojure, clojure-contrib and setup EMACS.
  3. Vim and “Slime”
  4. VIM for Clojure
  5. Quick-start with examples
  6. VIDEO – Great short introduction videos for Clojure!
  7. VIDEO – Introduction to logic programming with Clojure
  8. VIDEO – Clojure for Java Programmers 1 of 2
  9. VIDEO – Functional programming by UCBerkeley 
  10. VIDEO – Great tutorial for Clojure focused on concurrency
  11. Try code clojure online
  12. Leiningen tutorial for beginners
  13. Midje – A test framework for Clojure
  14. Clojars – Community repository for open source clojure libraries


Functional programming with Clojure


I’ve been studying the new language called Clojure (all the cool kids are talking about Clojure). It is a functional language created by Rich Hickey around 2007. This is a(nother) dialect of Lisp. It is a dynamic language as Ruby, JavaScript and others. As said before Clojure (pronounced as closure) it’s a impure functional language in contrast with Haskell, a pure functional language. It runs over the JVM, so it’s fast, interoperable with Java among a lots of good stuffs that JVM give us. To put hands-on and try code something you can use the try Clojure online or you can download the clojure.jar file and run it. Surprisingly Clojure it’s easy to learn.

java -jar clojure-x.x.x.jar

What it a functional language? (concepts)

first-order functions -> functions are treated as values. You can store a function on a variable, you can pass one function to another or you can return a function from another function.

var sum = function(a,b){
  return a + b;

var obj = function(sum){
  return {
    hello: "hello",
    sum: sum


functions constructs -> the language constructs are function instead of keyword. Constructions for conditions (if), for iterations (for, while), catch exceptions (try, catch) and others.

(if condition do-it else-do-it)

stateless -> it’s functional in the sense of math, you have functions which defines values input and output and doesn’t rely on outside global state. In such pure function you won’t produce any side-effect (read, write outside resource). Obviously we will produce programs which causes side-effects, clojure helps you build “mutable” data . On other pure languages like Haskell side-effects are treated as expections so you have concepts like actors and monad.

immutable data -> collections and local variable, in clojure, are immutable. The immutability, helps us in parallelism, since the “values” are immutable you can shared then without worry about locks.

currying -> is the technique of transforming a function that takes multiple arguments (or an n-tuple of arguments) in such a way that it can be called as a chain of functions each with a single argument (partial application).

memoization -> is an optimization technique used primarily to speed up computer programs by having function calls avoid repeating the calculation of results for previously processed inputs.